The Perverted Promise of 'Twilight'

VPhan's picture

            Recently, on Facebook, I posted my opinion that Stephen King will go down in history as one of the greatest writers ever, while Stephanie Meyer will be forgotten in the pages of time like all of the other pop authors who exploit the market for financial gain, as opposed to writing what's in their hearts.  A respondent replied that she felt Ms. Meyer was “brilliant” and she loved her “twist” to the modern day vampire.  My response was as a professional writer, Meyer is the polar opposite of brilliant.  Brilliant is J.K. Rowling’s twist on the modern wizard.  What Stephanie Meyer gave the world isn't a 'twist' but a perversion.

             Throughout literary history vampires have always been symbolic of the old aristocracy that drains the life of the common man.  Blood symbolizes the life that the old decrepit must feed from the living in order to survive.  If you read any of the original literature, Vampyre, Varney the Vampire, or Dracula, this theme is evident. 

The reason why the vampire has always appealed romantically to female fans is because death by vampire has always symbolized rape.  The vampire is this dark stranger who is extremely attractive and seems to have a hypnotic power over his victims.  They try with all of their might to resist him but eventually give in because it feels so good to die in his arms.  Isn’t the vampire bite, especially in Stoker’s novel, described as the “ultimate” orgasm? Also, vampires are supposed to be engulfed in flames when sunlight shines on them.  The reason for this is because they live in the world of the old and dark and fear change.  The sun symbolizes a new day on the horizon, a future that they cannot exist in.  That is why they die when the sun strikes them. 

             Meyer exploited the market by perverting these totems of mythology to make financial gain for herself.  She took something that has been established in the consciousness of mythology and changed it to her parameters to make a quick buck.  She exploited the hopes and dreams of young girls who are missing, deprived of, or haven't discovered affection or chivalry in their lives, and gave them the promise of a mythic being (albeit extremely changed) that will always accept them and will never struggle with them.  This trick works on the inexperienced or emotionally desperate reader but it will not work on the mature reader. 

The mature reader understands that true love does exist, but it is something that is never perfect and requires a lot of effort.  True love can only exist when both parties work together and overcome the obstacles keeping them apart, hence strengthening their bond.  Meyer promises these girls a sense of true love that fits perfectly together without conflict, like puzzle pieces.  That type of love does not exist and anyone who has ever been in love will say that love is difficult work.  Sadly the exploited are not aware of this and will gorge Meyer will their hard earned dollars and buy into that pre-broken promise, only to be disappointed later in life since they were expecting a Edward-Bella ending to everything. 

 If you want to read a good modern twist of the vampire legend that doesn't pervert, but actually expands on the myths, read Anne Rice's The Vampire Chronicles.  At least that author had a high enough IQ to ensure her novels are historically accurate and was professional enough to do her research.

 Victor Phan & Clark Jones

Torture Chamber Productions

December 22, 2009

VPhan's picture

Thanks, Chris!!!

Thanks for the props, Chris!  I'm currently raising money to shoot another horror film.  Any filmmaker will tell you that raising money is the hardest and most daunting part of the journey.  

I looked you up on amazon.  It seems like you've done pretty well for yourself in the horror publishing world.  

It's always great to know there are my horrorphiles out there other than myself.  It saddens me every time I'm at Borders and I see the horror shelves shrink and the Twilight shelves getting bigger.  

Hopefully if horroscribes like us keep up the good fight we won't have to see the day that horror literature goes the way of the Sega Dreamcast.  

Chris Stires's picture

You're Welcome

And thank you. I feel good about my novels and short stories. A couple years ago, a screenplay that I co-wrote with a good friend was optioned by a production company. We were paid option money but unfortunately the film was never made. It was a pretty-good I thought creature feature. Oh, well, that's the breaks. We have a new creature feature screenplay being read by another production company that looks promising. We'll see what happens.

You made me laugh with the Sega Dreamcast reference. I laughed because you made me feel a little old. You see, I would've said "goes the way of the 8-track tape."

Chris Stires's picture

Hello

 

Victor, I’m going to agree and disagree with you. First, I agree that King and Rowling – along with Elmore Leonard – will be read decades from now just as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Dashiell Hammett, and Raymond Chandler are still read today.
*
As for Ms. Meyer – I haven’t read any of her novels. Don’t have any interest in them. I did see the movie, Twilight – and barely kept awake during it. I have also tried to read Rice’s vampire novels and never finished any of them. (I did manage long ago to finish her erotic Beauty trilogy but that had a lot to do with a certain woman in my life at that time and is a totally a different topic.) The Interview with a Vampire film with Cruise as Lestat and Pitt as Louis was also under-whelming.
*
Where I disagree with you is when you say that twisting the old legends is perverting them and the only motivation is for a quick buck. The vampire Barlow in King’s Salem’s Lot is not an erotic creature of the night and the vampires in Kathryn Bigelow’s Near Dark are most definitely not aristocrats. That novel and film worked for me big time. I also prefer Karloff’s interpretation of the Monster in Frankenstein much more than the articulate creature Shelley created in her novel. Twisting and putting new spins on old legends and myths can work and has. Maybe not in the Twilight series, at least for you and me, but I do know several people who are very passionate about the series. There’s nothing wrong with being the flavor of the month. Sometimes the flavor hangs around for a lot longer than originally intended. Doyle “killed” off Sherlock Holmes so he could spend more time on his "important" works—his historical novels. No one was interested in them. He had to resurrect Holmes to make a living and he wrote his most famous Holmes story – The Hound of the Baskervilles.  I hope that some day one of my novels or screenplays is the popcorn that a lot of people want and enjoy for however briefly.
VPhan's picture

. . .

 I like the vampires you bring up with Barlow and Near Dark.  At least the authors/filmmakers tried to do something interesting with the mythology.  Meyer changed things around just to appeal to a wider demographic and make money.  

I'm sure the Twilight fans don't even know who Louie or Barlow are.  

Chris Stires's picture

REPLY

BTW, congratulations on your Knight of Shorts Film Festival win. Very cool.